Tuesday 11 December 2007

Rational thinking. 2

so that argument was good but not great however and this is the killer point , wat did ferrari gain frome the situatation , are u implying that it was orgonised as a sting to get mclaren thrown out ? That would be ridicuclas as why would ferrari want to loose risking the championship like that ? and geting lots of bad press which we dont want as it may comprimise our position with sponsors,
was this aimed to be to their advantage? NO wat is the aim of cheating , the aim of cheating is to gain advantage WAT ADVANTAGE WAS FERRARI TO GAIN? none if they had been implicated they would have been treated the same. The fact of the matter is that mclaren cheated (gained from receiving documentation from stepney) and they gained from it without considering how much they gained they did subsequently this falls under the term cheating.

Stallion (I will fight to the death ........or till u realise how wrong you are.)

1 comment:

Achilles said...

I absolutely adore your passion, but as a student of economics, it should be obvious what Ferrari, and for that matter, any team will gain from any suggestion of foul play, PUBLICITY!!!, any media coverage no matter how bad, that puts you , and your team on the front pages of the dailies, and TV front runners, is all good news to team, and sponsors alike. I know some sponsors will hate it, but look at your big players, they are still around, this sport is our passion, and the teams know this, and crave the economic gain that controversy brings, but how could they openly admit this?